Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Friday, April 10, 2009

Documentary Review: Unnatural Causes

The documentary that we watched this week was Unnatural Causes...is inequality making us sick? The section of this documentary that we watched was, "In sickness and in wealth". The main themes of this section were how jobs, wealth, etc.. affect our biology, and why some people get more sick than others and die sooner.

Summary
The documentary went around to four different neighborhoods in Louisville, Kentucky and interviewed someone who lived there to see what their life was like in that area. They first went to a North East neighborhood and interviewed a man named Jim Taylor. This area was a very high income area. The people who lived in this area were in the top 1% of income, which was more than the bottom 90% of people's incomes combined. Jim says that he feels safe in his neighborhood, and that there is no excess death in this area. The people in this area actually have a life expectancy that is two years over the national average.
Tonya was in the second neighborhood that this documentary looked at. This neighborhood was in southern Louisville, and was mainly middle class citizens. There was one thing that divided this neighborhood, and it was education. Apparently college graduates live two and a half years longer than people with just a high school diploma. College tuition keeps on increasing, so this division is a situation of money. Not everyone can afford going to college, therefore, people in this area have unequal lifespans. The people in this area will live four years less than the people in the really rich neighborhoods like Jim.
In West/Central Louisville, Cory was interviewed. This area was poor and had the median wealth of Louisville. In this area diseases sets in earlier, and people live six years less than the people in the really rich neighborhoods like Jim. In this neighborhood there aren't many businesses, all there is are liquor stores and fast food places. People who lose their jobs may need to leave home in order to find another. This is really bad because home ownership builds financial security.

The last neighborhood that was visited was farther West in Louisville. Mary, who lived there, never graduated from high school and is living at, or below the poverty level. There is also a lot of crime in this area. People who live in this area will live nine years less than people in the richest neighborhoods like Jim. She lives off of social security and eats what can fit into her budget. She often eats only one meal a day in order to mak
e her money last. Many people in this area are unemployed and feel like they have no control over how their lives are going to turn out. Here is an example of a problem that occurs in an area like Mary is living in. Mary currently needs medicine to be able to work, she needs to get health coverage in order to afford her medicine, but she needs to have a job in order to receive health coverage. This is a vicious circle, and there really isn't any way that she can stop this from happening.

The rest of this documentary explains the main reasons for unequal health in our nation. Life expectancy relies on resources available to people, like education, money, or your economic ranking. Social class influences events that impinge on people's lives. Poverty decreases control of one's life. No control leads to stress which leads to the body releasing cortosol (which puts your body on alert for survival), which increases heart rate and blood pressure, which accelerates aging and leads to an early death. Also, the higher demand of job you have, the more stress you have. There is more crime in poor areas, which also leads to a more stressful lifestyle. The documentary mentioned that the differences that people have are not natural, they come out of social policies that produce inequality. There is a lack of equal access to resources. Also, t
he more education someone has, the longer they live. I have heard all of these things before, but I have never actually seen proof of why this is. This documentary was really moving to me because of that. It really made me think of how lucky I am for the lifestyle that I have.

What Challenged My
Thinking

The first thing that really struck me was that we always see America representing good health, yet we spend tons of money on medical care, and still live shorter and sicker lives than any other industrialized country. We are ranked 30th for life expectancies, and more babies die here than in really poor places. Also, there are 47 million people in America that don't have health care coverage.

People who are in the top 1% of income have more money than the bottom 90% of people's incomes combined. I think that that is ridiculous.

I found the following to be really interesting. People who are poor and smoke are worse off than people who are rich and smoke. The same thing is true for stress. If two people are eating the same exact diet, but one is really stressed, the person who is stressed will form more plaque in their blood vessels, which will lead to an earlier death. This really explains why health is unequally distributed. Finally, black people that live just as well as white people, will still live less long. The reason for this is discrimination. Discrimination puts someone on constant guard, which leads to higher stress, which leads to an unhealthy lifestyle.

The more education, money, and status you have; the less stress you have, which means that you release less cortosol; which leads to less immune issues, which leads to better health. This proves how people who are poor and less educated have such a lower life expectancy. The relation between these traits are incredible.

The thing that I find really sad is that on top of the fact that rich people have less overall stress, they also have the money and resources available to reduce the stress that they do have. They have the time to exercise, the money to go on vacations, the money to eat healthier, etc.. This really is unfair becuase the people who have the most stress, the poor, don't have the resources they need in order to reduce their stress. This means that they most likely have at least twice the amount of stress that wealthier people have, which means that they will live relatively shorter, less quality lives.


Additional Resources
I found an article called,
"Health, Income, and Inequality", written by, Angus Deaton. This article was written through the NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research).
http://www.nber.org/reporter/spring03/health.html#N_*_

You can also visit the following website to learn more about the documentary, "Unnatural Causes".
http://www.unnaturalcauses.org/video_clips.php

Have a Great Day!!!

Monday, March 9, 2009

Review of Reading #31: Privatizing Water

Summary
This reading is written by Curtis Runyan, from the magazine, World Watch, in the January/February 2003 issue.

This article begins with an event that occurred on April 8, 2000. A Bolivian soldier shot into a crowd of protesters, and killed a 17 year old student. This angered the protesters, and so even more of them were injured. This protest took place in Cochabamba, Bolivia and was a "demonstration against the government's privatization of the city's water works"(McKinney, 128).

In September of 1999, Bolivia was threatened by the World Bank. The World Bank said that they would withhold 600 million in debt relief if they didn't privatize their water utilities. So, Cochabamba signed over its "aging, inadequate waterworks"(McKinney, 128). This lead to a 35% increase in water bills in just one month, and the service was still unreliable and infrequent. The book said that the water ran less than four hours a day in many parts of the city.(McKinney, 128) This really angered the people of Cochabamba, so a coalition of laborers, and environmentalists started a started a strike that shut down the city. All of this chaos led the government officials to call an emergency meeting to cancel the water contract and return the water control to the utility. The article says that the water troubles in Cochabamba are far from over.(McKinney, 128)

The rest of this article goes more in depth with the pros and cons of water privatization. Currently two large water corporations (Vivendi and Suez) are providing water to over 200 million people in more than 120 countries, and are each drawing annual revenues of roughly 10 billion dollars from water and waste water services. (McKinney, 129) More and more governments are turning to water privatization as a means to attract much needed investment in their water systems. (McKinney, 129) This article also explains that in 1992, at the Rio Earth Summit meeting, that water was recognized as a "economic good". (McKinney, 128) This has led to water being viewed more as a "profitable commodity rather than a human right in some areas"(McKinney, 128). The article mentions that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been pressuring countries to move to water privatization. Though, some cities are actually turning down large money bids from Suez, and controlling their own water.(McKinney, 129)

Since I learn better with lists than paragraphs, I am going to list the main pros and cons of Water Privatization for you. All of the below came straight from the book, McKinney pages 128-130.


PROS:

-Gives some governments the chance to attract the private capital and expertise needed to build and expand expensive water systems
-Helps connect the millions who currently make do without piped water.
-Provides equatable access to water for poor communities.
-Help improve efficiency and and productivity of water systems.
-Help utilities improve their services by providing the capital and expertise needed to, for example, repair leaks in water mains, expand connections to unserved communities, or improve billing systems.
-Help when governments are weak and cannot meet the basic water needs of their country/city.

CONS:

-Drastic rate increases
-Inadequate customer service
-Loss of local control and accountability
-Undermine conservation programs
-Degrade ecosystems through efforts to tap new water sources.
-Significant job cuts
-Fewer environmental safeguards
-Dropped conservation initiatives
-Halted service to poor or remote communities
-Companies are more motivated by profit than public service. This can leave poor and underserved communities neglected
-Weak governments are unable to provide the oversight and management functions necessary to protect public interests. This can lead to corruption.

My Thoughts

This reading was really interesting to me because I am honestly confused on whether or not their should be water privatization. There are many things about it that really rub me the wrong way, but then there are some things that seem extremely necessary. I think that it is really important that their is equal access to clean water for everyone, and that is one of the things that water privatization will help with. Another thing that really struck me in this article was that many poorer communities are paying much more for safe drinking water than we are. That just doesn't seem fair. I would like to end my review with a great question asked by Sandra Postel, of the Global Water Policy Project. She asked, "How do we mobilize the capital needed to put in the pumps, pipes, and wells that are needed, and do it in a way that is fair, affordable, and environmentally sound?"(McKinney, 130).

Vocabulary

World Bank-an international bank established in 1944 to help member nations reconstruct and develop, esp. by guaranteeing loans: a specialized agency of the United Nations.

International Monetary Fund-an international organization that promotes the stabilization of the world's currencies and maintains a monetary pool from which member nations can draw in order to correct a deficit in their balance of payments: a specialized agency of the United Nations

Privatization-changing something from state to private ownership or control

Rio Earth Summit in 1992-sought to help Governments rethink economic development and find ways to halt the destruction of irreplaceable natural resources and pollution of the planet.

Martial Law-the body of law imposed by the military over civilian affairs (usually in time of war or civil crisis); overrides civil law

Consortium-a combination of financial institutions, capitalists, etc., for carrying into effect some financial operation requiring large resources of capital.

Coalition-a combination or alliance, esp. a temporary one between persons, factions, states, etc.

Rescinded-To make void; repeal or annul.

Commodification-to turn into an article of trade

Global Water Policy Project-aims to promote the preservation and sustainable use of Earth’s fresh water through research, writing, outreach, and public speaking

Municipal-of or pertaining to a town or city or its local government

Infrastructure-the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organization.

Paternalistic-the system, principle, or practice of managing or governing individuals, businesses, nations, etc., in the manner of a father dealing benevolently and often intrusively with his children

Subsidiary-serving to assist or supplement

Lobbying-to try to influence the actions of (public officials, esp. legislators).

Provision-the providing or supplying of something, esp. of food or other necessities.

Breach-the act or a result of breaking; break or rupture.


Extra Links


I found more information about Water Privatization on Wikipedia, and I found a Water Privatization Overview article on the Public Citizen Webpage.


Have a Great Day!!!

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Keep it Safe With Me!


Hi, my name is Sara! I am a Community Health Education major at the University of Minnesota Duluth. This blog is going to focus on different ways to keep the environment safe.

There are 5 possible types of posts on my blog. They include:
Advocacy Project
Eye Openers
Reflections
Reviews
Share and Voice

If you notice at the bottom of this post, the categories will be listed as labels. This post is has been labeled with all five kinds of posts. You will also see the number of each kind of post in my Labels Gadget at the top of the page. All post titles from now on will begin with one of the categories above.

The members of my web group are:
1. Noah: Noah's Greenlicious Environment
2. Shannon: Keepin' it green with Shannon
3. Brenda: Brenda's Environmental Health
4. Samantha: Running with the Wild
5. Valerie: Valerie the Spring Girl
You can subscribe to my blog by clicking the subscribe gadget in the gadget column. You can also follow my blog by clicking "Follow this Blog" in the gadget column. I am subscribed to all the blogs in my blog list gadget. You can see my complete profile and all the blogs I am following by clicking on "See Complete Profile."

Thanks for visiting my blog! I hope you keep coming back to help me discover and share new ways to keep the environment safe!